New report suggests Israeli military views some Gaza journalists as ‘legitimate targets’

Media watchdogs reported that around 30 percent of the 108 media workers killed since Oct. 7 in Gaza were employed by outlets affiliated with or closely tied to Hamas. (AFP/File)
Media watchdogs reported that around 30 percent of the 108 media workers killed since Oct. 7 in Gaza were employed by outlets affiliated with or closely tied to Hamas. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 25 June 2024
Follow

New report suggests Israeli military views some Gaza journalists as ‘legitimate targets’

New report suggests Israeli military views some Gaza journalists as ‘legitimate targets’
  • The Guardian and non-profit Forbidden Stories allege that Israeli forces label journalists working for Hamas-controlled media as terrorists
  • Experts argue this approach is part of effort to silence critical reporting

LONDON: A new investigation has suggested that the Israeli military views some Gaza-based journalists as “legitimate targets.”

The Guardian, in collaboration with the Paris-based non-profit Forbidden Stories, revealed that some members of the armed forces consider journalists working for Hamas-controlled or affiliated outlets as legitimate targets not covered by the same international protections as civilians.

Media watchdogs Committee to Protect Journalists and Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism reported that around 30 percent of the 108 media workers killed since Oct. 7 in Gaza were employed by outlets affiliated with or closely tied to Hamas.

This includes the largest Hamas-run outlet in Gaza, Al-Aqsa media network, which employs hundreds of people across its TV station, radio, and newspaper arms.

The report, authored by Harry Davies, Manisha Ganguly, David Pegg, Hoda Osman, Bethan McKernan, and award-winning Israeli journalist and film director Yuval Abraham, noted that while “Al-Aqsa’s programming is unmistakably pro-Hamas, anti-Israel and, at times, antisemitic … simply working (for the media outlet) does not make someone a legitimate target to be killed.”

Janina Dill, a professor at the University of Oxford and expert in the laws of war, said: “Reporting the news is not direct participation in hostilities.

“Even if they reported the news in a biased way, even if they did propaganda for Hamas, even if Israel fundamentally disagrees with how they report the news. That is not enough.”

Since 2019, Israel has designated Al-Aqsa network as a terrorist organization, calling it “a propaganda arm of Hamas and a central platform for the distribution of inciting messages by the terror organization.”

The media group has also been sanctioned by the US since 2010.

Its offices, evacuated after Hamas attacks on Oct. 7 to avoid Israeli retaliation, have been previously bombed by Israel over accusations of being used for military purposes.

The report detailed how Israeli soldiers were given a “permissive approach” to targeting, with Hamas-affiliated media being told they existed in a “grey zone” and that some in the Israeli military hold the view that “anyone getting paid by Hamas” could be considered a legitimate target.

“Hamas invests a lot of resources in its propaganda teams. They often won’t do an activity if they don’t have a photographer. They must document everything,” an unnamed military intelligence officer said. “So some will tell you: ‘Look, a Hamasnik is Hamasnik.’”

An Israeli military spokesperson denied the report’s accusations, stating that while it “does not target civilian objects,” the outlet “employs terrorists and affords them the facade of journalists.”

The spokesperson claimed that the Israeli military killed six Al-Aqsa workers who were alleged members of Hamas’s armed wing but did not provide evidence to support the claim.

Experts warned that this approach puts Israel in a “troubling position” as it is often difficult to distinguish between combatants and civilians.

Many press freedom organizations expressed concerns about the military’s efforts to silence critical reporting.

Irene Khan, the UN’s special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, stated that Israel had “spread disinformation about journalists being linked to militants” and failed to meet the “burden of proof” to make such claims.


Australia PM hits back at Musk after ‘fascists’ quip

Australia PM hits back at Musk after ‘fascists’ quip
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Australia PM hits back at Musk after ‘fascists’ quip

Australia PM hits back at Musk after ‘fascists’ quip
  • Australia introduced a ‘combating misinformation’ bill earlier this week
  • Bill includes sweeping powers to fine tech giants up to five percent of their annual turnover for breaching online safety obligations

SYDNEY: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hit back at Elon Musk on Saturday after the tech mogul called his government “fascists” for proposing laws that would fine social media giants for spreading misinformation.
Australia introduced a “combating misinformation” bill earlier this week, which includes sweeping powers to fine tech giants up to five percent of their annual turnover for breaching online safety obligations.
“Fascists,” Musk posted Thursday on his social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.
But Albanese fired back at Musk on Saturday, saying social media “has a social responsibility.”
“If Mr.Musk doesn’t understand that, that says more about him than it does about my government,” he told reporters Saturday.
The exchange between Musk and Australian officials is the latest in a long-running spat with the Australian government over social media regulation.
Australia’s government is exploring a raft of new measures that would see social media companies take greater accountability for the content on their platforms — including a ban for those under 16 years old.
The country’s online watchdog took Musk’s company to court earlier this year, alleging it had failed to remove “extremely violent” videos that showed a Sydney preacher being stabbed.
But it abruptly dropped its attempt to force a global takedown order on X after Musk scored a legal victory in a preliminary hearing, a move he celebrated as a free speech triumph.
Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” has clashed with politicians and digital rights groups worldwide, including in the European Union, which could decide within months to take action against X with possible fines.
In Brazil, where X has effectively been suspended after it ignored a series of court directives, Musk has responded by blasting the judge as an “evil dictator cosplaying as a judge.”


Blinken denounces ‘covert’ activities by Russia’s RT media

Blinken denounces ‘covert’ activities by Russia’s RT media
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Blinken denounces ‘covert’ activities by Russia’s RT media

Blinken denounces ‘covert’ activities by Russia’s RT media

WASHINGTON: Top US diplomat Antony Blinken on Friday accused Russian media outlet RT of being a “de facto arm of Russia’s intelligence apparatus.”
“We know that RT possess cyber capabilities and engaged in covert information influence operations and military procurement,” the secretary of state told reporters.
Earlier this month, US authorities announced a battery of measures including sanctions and potential prosecution targeting Russian media over alleged attempts to interfere in this year’s American elections.
The State Department at that time imposed visa restrictions affecting a media group that includes RT, Rossia Segodnia, as well as others of its affiliates.
On Friday, Washington emphasized that the group’s efforts at destabilization extend far beyond the United States.
It said the Russian government this spring “embedded within RT an entity with cyber operational capabilities and ties to Russian intelligence.”
It added: “This cyber entity has focused primarily on influence and intelligence operations all over the world.”


Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon
  • Issam Abdallah was killed by Israeli tank shells while filming cross-border exchange in south Lebanon in October
  • Letter demands UN Commission to investigate possible war crimes, ensure accountability

LONDON: Advocacy groups have urged UN officials to investigate the death of Reuters video journalist Issam Abdallah, who was killed in southern Lebanon in October.

In a letter signed by 11 organizations, including the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders and the Lebanese Center for Human Rights, the group requested the UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, to examine the circumstances surrounding Israel’s Oct. 13 attack.

They also urged the commission to investigate potential war crimes committed against journalists since the start of the Israel-Gaza conflict on Oct. 7.

Abdallah, a 37-year-old video journalist, was killed by Israeli tank shells while filming a cross-border exchange.

Six other journalists were injured in the attack, including AFP photographer Christina Assi, who had her leg amputated.

Independent investigations by Reuters, AFP, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and RSF concluded that the attack was “deliberately” launched by Israeli forces on “clearly visible media members.”

The organizations condemned the attack as a violation of international law and called for a war crimes investigation.

A sixth investigation conducted by UNIFIL similarly concluded, according to a Reuters report published in March, that “an Israeli tank killed Reuters reporter Issam Abdallah in Lebanon by firing two 120 mm rounds at a group of ‘clearly identifiable journalists’ in violation of international law.”

The letter asked the UN to publicly identify the military unit responsible for the attack and criticized Israeli authorities for failing to hold the perpetrators accountable.

“We submit this request in the hope that the work of the Commission may contribute to ensuring accountability for the killing of Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who lost his life in that attack, and for the six other journalists injured alongside him: Agence France Presse (AFP) journalists Christina Assi and Dylan Collins; Al Jazeera journalists Carmen Joukhadar and Elie Brakhya; and Reuters journalists Maher Nazih and Thaer Al-Soudani,” the letter read.

“Over 10 months have passed since this potential war crime was committed, but no tangible steps have been taken by any judicial body to secure justice for the victims and accountability for the perpetrators.”

It added: “We believe this to be of crucial importance to ensure redress for all victims, as well as to end impunity for crimes committed against journalists since 7 October 2023, including the ongoing targeting of journalists in Gaza, where more than 100 media employees have been killed by Israeli forces.”


Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats
  • Desicion was taken after receiving ‘significant threats to festival operations and public safety’
  • Film features a Russian battalion as it advanced across eastern Ukraine in February 2022

OTTAWA: The Toronto International Film Festival said Thursday it was pausing all upcoming screenings of controversial documentary “Russians at War” after receiving “significant threats.”
“We have been made aware of significant threats to festival operations and public safety,” festival organizers said in a statement, pointing to reports they received “indicating potential activity in the coming days that pose significant risk.”
“This is an unprecedented move for TIFF,” read the statement.
“Given the severity of these concerns, we cannot proceed as planned.”
Anastasia Trofimova first presented “Russians at War” at the Venice Film Festival.
In the film, she embedded with a Russian battalion as it advanced across eastern Ukraine after Moscow launched its invasion in February 2022.
It was to have its North American premiere in Toronto on Friday, followed by additional screenings on Saturday and Sunday.
Both in Venice and Toronto it has sparked outrage in Ukrainian cultural and political circles against what many consider a pro-Kremlin film that seeks to whitewash and justify Moscow’s assault on its neighbor.
Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said he felt the festival should have dropped the film.
“The threat is Russian propaganda,” he wrote on Telegram, adding that the film should be “banned.”
Canada’s deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, criticized the planned screening in Toronto.
“There can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict,” she said.
Canadian public broadcaster TVO, which had helped fund the documentary, pulled its support for the film and said it would not be airing it.
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s state film agency appealed to TIFF to drop the film, which it said was “a dangerous tool for public opinion manipulation.”
Trofimova has rejected the criticisms, telling AFP the Canada-France production was “an anti-war film” that showed “ordinary guys” who were fighting for Russia.
The soldiers depicted appear to have little idea of why they have been sent to the front, and are shown struggling to make Soviet-era weapons serviceable.
Others chain-smoke cigarettes and down shots of alcohol amid the deaths and wounds of their comrades.
Producer Sean Farnel said on X that the decision to cancel the screenings was “heartbreaking.”
He blamed officials’ public criticisms for having “incited the violent hate that has led to TIFF’s painful decision to pause its presentation of ‘Russians at War.’“


Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death
  • Washington Post investigation suggests Aysenur Ezgi Eygi’s was the result of a ‘mischaracterization’ of events by soldiers
  • Reconstruction of events reveals Eygi was shot about 20 minutes after protesters had retreated

LONDON: Turkish-American activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi’s death was the result of a “mischaracterization” of events by Israeli forces, raising fresh doubts about the official account, according to an investigation by the Washington Post.

Eygi was fatally shot in the head in early September while participating in a protest against Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Although Israeli authorities initially described her death as likely “indirect and unintentional,” the Post’s investigation, based on 13 eyewitness testimonies and over 50 videos and photos provided by the International Solidarity Movement, paints a different picture.

The report indicates that the protests had largely subsided before Israeli soldiers opened fire.

Eygi was shot roughly 30 minutes after the height of confrontations, and about 20 minutes after protesters had retreated down the main road, some 200 yards (183 meters) away from Israeli forces.

Eygi herself had withdrawn to an olive grove far from the soldiers, approximately 180 meters away, before being struck by a bullet.

Witnesses claimed that a Palestinian teenager standing about 18 meters away from Eygi may have been the intended target of Israeli fire.

The Israeli army declined to comment on the investigation.

According to one of her colleagues, Eygi had explicitly decided beforehand she did not want to be “near any action.”

The report described chaotic scenes of violence following Friday prayers in the town of Beita, near Nablus, in the West Bank.

After young Palestinians erected barricades and threw rocks, Israeli soldiers responded with teargas and live ammunition.

Eygi, however, had moved to an olive grove far from the confrontation when she was hit by the fatal bullet.

The Post’s findings cast doubt on the justification for using live fire in this case, highlighting concerns about the broader use of excessive force by Israeli soldiers in the West Bank.

Israeli rights groups have noted that soldiers are often given broad discretion to open fire, even based on perceived future threats from suspects.

The incident has prompted international criticism, including from US President Joe Biden, who expressed sadness and anger over the death, though he echoed the Israeli account that the shooting was accidental.

Eygi’s family, however, has rejected this explanation, accusing the US government of accepting Israel’s narrative without independent investigation.

“President Biden is still calling her killing an accident based only on the Israeli military’s story. This is not only insensitive and false, it is complicit in the Israeli military’s agenda to take Palestinian land and whitewash the killing of an American,” the family said in a statement earlier this week.

Tensions between the US and Israel have grown more strained in recent months, particularly as violence in the West Bank has surged since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attacks.

At least 634 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces during this period, according to the UN.